The Eighth Leonidas Donskis Conference. Back to Square One: The Rise and Fall of the Helsinki Accords

We are living through a moment of profound global realignment. In the face of war and rising authoritarianism, the institutions and frameworks meant to protect fundamental rights appear increasingly sidelined. The promises of 1989-1991 are unravelling; from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and internal repression to rising militarization and systematic disinformation, there is a […]

Fifteenth International Sakharov Conference. Pulling Back from the Abyss: The Global Consequences of the War in Ukraine

The world order built after WWII is crumbling. Russia’s war against Ukraine has reshaped global politics, challenging European security, transatlantic relations, and the role of international institutions. Authoritarian governance is on the rise, deepening the global political crisis. This year’s Sakharov Conference will explore: The impact of the war in Ukraine beyond Europe The decline […]

Second International Rethinking Mental Health Care Conference: Navigating New Challenges and Innovations in the Digital Age

The conference will convene mental health leaders, practitioners, and policymakers to address  the urgent global need for accessible, effective, and innovative mental health services.  Together, we will spotlight evidence-based, human rights-oriented approaches and explore transformative practices, reforms, and initiatives that are reshaping mental health care in a rapidly changing world.   Key Topics: Expande mental […]

The Federation Global Initiative on Psychiatry cannot remain silent:

Who protects those who protect others?

In a statement issued on December 10, 2025, the Trump administration announced its opposition to the resolution Safety and Security of Humanitarian Personnel and Protection of UN Personnel. The resolution, which emphasizes the need to comply with international humanitarian law, addresses the need to ensure the safety of humanitarian workers and UN personnel in conflict zones. It also calls for accountability for attacks on these workers.
 
While the United States claims to take the safety and security of humanitarian personnel seriously, it cannot support this resolution, which it considers purely symbolic. It sees it as a waste of resources and moreover refuses to contribute to the promotion of a radical gender ideology, such as that promoted by the United Nations. An ideology that, according to the Trump administration, undermines true equality between biological men and women.
 
President Trump, a man who used his wealth and status to avoid military service, is thus disparaging doctors, nurses, and other humanitarian workers who work in conflict zones like Gaza or Ukraine. Among which there are undoubtedly ‘real men and women’.
 
The Trump administration’s full eccentric reasoning can be read here: